On this page
The heaviest elements on the periodic table are fleeting — oganesson atoms last less than a millisecond. You’d expect things to get even worse beyond it. But since the 1960s, nuclear physicists have predicted something surprising: somewhere beyond the current table, there may be a region of superheavy nuclei that are much more stable than their neighbours. They called it the island of stability.
Picture the “sea of instability”
Imagine a map with the number of protons on one axis and neutrons on the other. The roughly 250 stable nuclei form a narrow diagonal band — the “peninsula” of stability — that ends at lead. Beyond it, nuclei become increasingly unstable, decaying faster and faster. That’s the sea.
The island is a predicted patch in that sea where nuclei might live not for microseconds but for minutes, days, or — in the most optimistic predictions — much longer.
Magic numbers
The idea comes from the nuclear shell model. Just as electrons fill shells in an atom, and atoms with full shells (the noble gases) are especially stable, protons and neutrons fill shells inside the nucleus.
Nuclei with a filled shell of protons or neutrons are unusually stable. The numbers that fill a shell are called magic numbers:
2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, 126
Maria Goeppert Mayer and J. Hans D. Jensen explained these numbers in 1949 and shared the 1963 Nobel Prize in Physics for it.
Nuclei that are magic in both protons and neutrons — doubly magic — are especially stable:
- Helium-4 (2 protons, 2 neutrons) — why alpha particles are so tightly bound
- Oxygen-16 (8, 8)
- Calcium-40 (20, 20) and calcium-48 (20, 28)
- Lead-208 (82, 126) — the heaviest stable doubly magic nucleus
Where’s the island?
The next magic numbers are predicted to be around 114, 120 or 126 protons (different models disagree) and 184 neutrons. A nucleus with about 114–126 protons and 184 neutrons would sit at the centre of the island.
Evidence so far
The superheavy elements made so far (up to 118) have fewer neutrons than the island needs — around 170–177, not 184. Still, there are encouraging signs:
- Isotopes of elements 110–116 with more neutrons generally live longer than lighter isotopes of the same element, as if they’re approaching the shore. Some flerovium (114) and copernicium (112) isotopes last seconds, which is remarkably long for their mass.
- Their decay patterns show hints of the extra stability predicted near 114 protons.
So the island’s shoreline may have been reached, but not its centre.
Why we can’t just go there
To make superheavy nuclei, scientists fuse two lighter nuclei (see how new elements are made). The problem is the neutron-to-proton ratio. Heavy nuclei need proportionally more neutrons to be stable than light ones do. When you fuse two lighter nuclei, the product has too few neutrons for its size.
Even calcium-48, the most neutron-rich stable beam available, produces superheavy nuclei several neutrons short of 184. Getting there would need more neutron-rich beams and targets than exist, or entirely different techniques (such as multi-nucleon transfer reactions, which are being actively researched).
How stable would the island be?
Nobody knows. Early optimistic predictions imagined half-lives of millions of years, which would mean superheavy elements might even exist in nature. Most modern calculations are more modest — seconds to perhaps days or years for the most stable nuclei. Searches for naturally occurring superheavy elements in minerals and cosmic rays haven’t found convincing evidence.
Even a few minutes would be revolutionary: long enough to study the chemistry of these elements in detail, and to test how relativity reshapes chemistry at the bottom of the periodic table.
Quick answers
What is the island of stability? A predicted group of superheavy nuclei, around 114–126 protons and 184 neutrons, expected to be much longer-lived than their neighbours.
Has it been reached? Not its centre. Current superheavy isotopes are a few neutrons short, though they show signs of increasing stability.
Why are magic numbers stable? Filled nuclear shells are energetically favourable, just like filled electron shells.
Advertisement